2017年10月11日水曜日

Yanbaru Forest in Danger: US Military Helicopter on Fire near World Natural Heritage Nominated Area

In just a few days, members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) will conduct a much-anticipated field mission in the Yanbaru forest in northern Okinawa Island as part of the UNESCO/IUCN's evaluation process for the forest's bid for World Natural Heritage status. 

Guess what has just happened in the Takae district of Hiagashi village, near the World Heritage nominated area?


Around 17:30 on October 11,  a U.S. military CH 53 helicopter made an emergency landing and caught fire in an open land in Takae. As of 20:00, the fire and smoke are flaring in the darkness of the night. See this NHK site (Japanese). Also see this New York Times site.



© Okinawa Times 

It is not clear whether the helicopter was either coming back from or was going to the U.S. military's Northern Training Area (NTA) when it made its emergency landing. NTA is located just next to the World Natural Heritage nominated area. 

I have no information on the status of the crew who were on the CH 53 aircraft. I hope they evacuated safely in time. I have no information on the extent of the damage the accident has caused on the area.


Luckily, no one in Takae was hurt, a friend in Takae told me on the phone.

This brings me to what I originally planned to upload on this blog today: Our factsheets "A World Natural Heritage Site next to U.S. Military's Training Area?: The Case of Northern Part of Okinawa Island, Japan." I have submitted them to the members of the IUCN field mission.

The factsheets warned and predicted this unfortunate helicopter crash.  

H.Y.


Factsheets

A World Natural Heritage Site next to U.S. Military’s Training Area?: 
The Case of Northern Part of Okinawa Island, Japan

In February 2017, the Japanese government nominated the Northern Part of Okinawa Island (NPOI), along with Amami-Oshima Island, Tokunoshima Island, and Iriomote Island for UNESCO’s World Natural Heritage (WNH). IUCN has begun its evaluation process for these nominated sites. Serious concerns have been raised, however. Not only is NPOI located just next to U.S. military’s Northern Training Area (NTA), but also the Japanese government failed to properly address in its nomination dossier submitted to UNESCO the presence and operation of NTA. Below are some important facts and issues regarding NTA and suggestions for IUCN and UNESCO evaluation teams.

Northern Training Area (NTA)
The U.S. military’s 3,900 hectares “Northern Training Area” (NTA) is located just next to NPOI. See Figure 1.
NTA is used for “jungle warfare training” and low altitude “terrain flight training” of MV-22 Osprey and other aircraft.[1]  It is used in conjunction with other military bases and training areas in Okinawa as U.S. military conducts flight training between bases and training areas. See Figure 2.
NTA is home to many endangered species including endemic and Japan’s “Natural Monuments” Okinawa rail (Gallirallis okinawae) and the Pryer’s woodpecker (Sapheopipo noguchii).[2]  See Figure 3.    
Forest fires and aircraft crashes occur in and around NTA, damaging the environment and threatening the lives of local residents.[3]
In December 2016, amidst protest, the construction of six new aircraft landing zones was completed in environmentally sensitive areas of NTA. Environmental impacts on areas outside NTA from the construction and operation of the new landing zones have been reported.[4]
In December 2016, the U.S. military returned 4, 000 hectares of land formally used as part of NTA, reducing the area of NTA to the present 3,900 hectares. The U.S. military notes however that “this transfer of lands places the same amount of training on a smaller land base, which may create the possibility of increased adverse effects (p.113).”[5]


The U.S. Military’s Control over NTA
The U.S. military, not the Japanese government, has exclusive control over NTA and other U.S. military bases and training areas in Okinawa.[6] This means, when a forest fire or an aircraft crash occurs in NTA, the Japanese government or local authorities cannot enter NTA to conduct fire fighting operation or damage survey.
It is unknown whether and how the U.S. military’s exclusive control over NTA affects the Japanese government’s management of NPOI as a WNH site.

IUCN Efforts and Results
In IUCN Recommendation 2.72, IUCN requested the Japanese government to nominate the Yambaru forest (northern part of Okinawa Island) for WNH status.
The Japanese government fulfilled this part of the recommendation as it nominated NPOI as a WNH site.
In IUCN Recommendations 2.72 and 3.114, IUCN requested the Japanese and U.S. governments to conduct proper Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the construction of landing zones in NTA. The Japanese government conducted its EIA and the U.S. military conducted an “Environmental Review” (ER) regarding the operation of MV-22 Osprey aircraft in NTA.[7]
These EIA and ER have been challenged by experts and NGOs. In fact, in November 2016, Okinawa Prefectural Government asked the Japanese government to redo an EIA regarding the construction of landing zones. The Japanese government declined to do so however.


Problem of Silence
The Japanese government’s WNH nomination dossier failed to properly address the facts and issues mentioned above[8], undermining the scientific values of the dossier itself and making it extremely difficult for IUCN and UNESCO to conduct proper evaluation regarding NPOI.  
The dossier failed to incorporate any NTA-related documents produced by the U.S. military including Integrated Natural Resources and Cultural Resources Management Plan (2014) and Survey on Okinawa Rail at Jungle Warfare Training Center (2010).[9] These documents are informative of the natural environment of NTA and management efforts put forth by the U.S. military although their primary objectives are to support the U.S. military’s training environment. See Figure 3.
The Japanese environment ministry told NGOs that it did not include these facts and issues in the dossier because “the Japanese government has no control or jurisdiction over NTA.”[10]
The U.S. military and U.S. government have not made public their stances on the WNH nomination of NPOI in relation to NTR: It is not known whether they support the nomination or not.[11] See Attached document.

Suggestions for IUCN and UNESCO evaluation teams
IUCN and UNESCO evaluation teams recognize the U.S. military and U.S. government as important stakeholders in the nomination and inscription of NPOI for WNH.
IUCN and UNESCO request the Japanese government to include information on NTA provided by the U.S. military into its WNH nomination dossier.
IUCN and UNESCO evaluation teams, as well as the Japanese government, request the U.S. military and U.S. government to take part in and to support the inscription process of NPOI for WNH. 



For Further Information, please Contact:
      Hideki Yoshikawa
      Director, Okinawan Environmental Justice Project
      Email: yhidekiy@gmail.com
      Website: http://okinawaejp.blogspot.jp/


1. For general description of military training in NTA, see “Chapter 9-Camp Gonsalves/ Jungle Warfare Training Center” in Final Integrated Natural Resources and Cultural Resources Management Plan (2014), Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, MCIPAC Installations Okinawa, Japan. For description of MV-22 Osprey Aircraft training in NTA, see Environmental Review for Basing MV-22 Aircraft at MCAS Futenma and Operating in Japan (2012), Department of the Navy and the United States Marine Corps and Marine Corps Installation Command Pacific.  
2. See “Chapter 9-Camp Gonsalves/ Jungle Warfare Training Center” in Final Integrated Natural Resources and Cultural Resources Management Plan (2014), Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, MCIPAC Installations Okinawa, Japan.
3. See Okinawa no beigun kichi [U.S. military bases in Okinawa] (2013), Military Base Affairs Division, Executive Office of the Governor, Okinawa Prefectural Government.
4. Miyagi, Akino 2017, “Yanbaruno dobutsu to seibutsu tayosei: Takae Aha de hakkenshita kisho dobutsu to heripado kensetsu ga dobutsu ni ataeta eikyo [Animals and the biodiversity in Yanbaru (Northern Okinawa Islanad): Rare Anmials Found in Takae and Awa areas, Higashi KUnigami, Okinawa and Actual Damages on the Aimals by Construction of Osprey Pad[s]]” in Nihon no kagakusha /Journal of Japanese Scientists, 52 (4), pp. 192-197. 

5. See “Chapter 9-Camp Gonsalves/ Jungle Warfare Training Center” in Final Integrated Natural Resources and Cultural Resources Management Plan (2014), Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, MCIPAC Installations Okinawa, Japan.
6. Article II-I (a) of the Status of Armed Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the U.S. and Japan stipulates that “[t]he United State is granted, under Article VI of the Treaty Mutual Cooperation and Security, the use of facilities and areas in Japan.”  Article III of SOFA stipulates that “[w]ithin the facilities and areas, the United States may take all the measures necessary for their establishment, operation, safeguarding and control.”
http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/usa/sfa/pdfs/fulltext.pdf 

7. See Environmental Review for Basing MV-22 Aircraft at MCAS Futenma and Operating in Japan (2012), Department of the Navy and the United States Marine Corps and Marine Corps Installation Command Pacific. 


9. See Survey on Okinawa Rail at Jungle Warfare Training Center (2010), Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, MCIPAC Installations Okinawa, Japan.

10. Article III of SOFA between the U.S. and Japanese governments states “[w]ithin the facilities and areas, the United States may take all the measures necessary for their establishment, operation, safeguarding and control.”

http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/usa/sfa/pdfs/fulltext.pdf

11. See “U.S. military must not jeopardize Okinawan forest’s bid for World Heritage Status.” Hideki Yoshikawa, The Japan Times, February 1, 2017.  https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2017/02/01/voices/u-s-military-must-not-jeopardize-okinawan-forests-bid-world-heritage-status/#.WdqN-2K0My4



Figure 1





Figure 2



Figure 3


Figure 3: “Distribution map of protected plant and wildlife species” in NTA provided in the U.S. military’s Integrated Natural Resources and Cultural Resources Management Plan (p.122) (2014). 






2017年2月15日水曜日

Okinawa Governor's Visit to Washington DC: Our Analysis

From January 30 to February 5, Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga, accompanied by a delegation of “All-Okinawa Kaigi (conference),” visited Washington D.C. It was his third visit to the center of U.S. power since he took over the office of Governor in November 2014.  

Just like in his previous visits, the purpose of his visit this time was to ask those on Capitol Hill to cancel the plan to relocate the U.S. Futenma Air Station in Ginowan City to Henoko and Oura Bay in Nago City. Throughout his visit, he emphasized that the people of Okinawa continue to oppose the construction a new base there (the Henoko plan) and that he would use all his administrative power and means to stop the construction. 


Governor Onaga at George Washington University (Kyodo)

How did Governor Onaga’s visit go? What would Governor Onaga and the people of Okinawa do next? Here are our reviews and analysis. 


Court Decision in Japan and Trump Chaos in the U.S. 
Unfortunately for Governor Onaga and Okinawa, his trip took place against the backdrop of two unfavorable circumstances. 

First of all, on December 20, 2016, the Japanese supreme court ruled against Governor Onaga, deciding that Onaga’s revocation of the land reclamation permit granted by former Okinawa governor Hirokazu Nakaima was illegal (see The Japan Times). 

Four days later on December 26, Governor Onaga withdrew his revocation, claiming that he had to follow the rule of law and insisting that he has other "administrative means" to continue his fight. His withdrawal cleared up the legal hurdle for the Japanese government, enabling the Okinawa Defense Bureau to resume its drilling surveys and construction activities, which had been halted since March 2016. 

Secondly, as the world has already known by then, with Mr. Trump in the White House, chaos was the name of the game in Washington D.C. Congress men and women as well as federal agencies were very much occupied with their own issues, and apparently they did not have time for Onaga and Okinawa.

Despite Governor Onaga’s gleam of hope that the un-orthodox President Trump and his administration still in process of being formed could provide political space for change on the Henoko plan in U.S. policy (see The Mainichi Shimbun), his team faced difficulty even scheduling meetings with Congress members and federal officials.

In short, Governor Onaga arrived in a chaotic D.C. without much to show to back up his claims. 

Media Evaluations of Governor Onaga’s Visit
Governor Onaga was able to meet twelve House representatives but no senators. He also met with Joe Young, Director for Japanese affairs at the State Department and Paul Vosti, the acting director for Japan in the Pentagon. He also participated in a symposium at George Washington University (see The Asahi Shimbun).

At a press conference at the National Press Club in D.C., Governor Onaga summarized his visit as a success and better than the previous visits. He emphasized that “We were able to gain understanding on the Okinawa base issues, including the construction of the new base, from members of the Senate and House” (The Ryukyu Shimpo).


However, the media covered and evaluated his trip differently. The Okinawan media, which reported Governor Onaga’s previous trips to D.C. in very favorable terms for him, was very critical this time. While regarding the Henoko plan as undemocratic and unjust, they casted doubt on the timing of his visit as well as what his visit had actually accomplished (see for example The Okinawa Times (in Japanese only)).


The Okinawa Times  (Feb.5, 2017)
Headlines read "Governor's enthusiasm fails to bring results" "U.S.-Japan reaffirm Henoko plan as Okinawa delegation visits U.S." "Concerns raised over "Crushing Okinawa"" 

Meanwhile, the Japanese mainland media paid little attention to Governor Onaga’s visit. Instead, they focused on the larger political shows in Tokyo of newly appointed Defense Secretary James Mattis’ meetings with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Defense Minister Tomomi Inada (see their joint briefing), which were taking place as Onaga was finishing up his trip. 

In fact, in most of the Japanese media coverage, Onaga’s visit and his determination to fight the Henoko plan was pitted against and was undermined by the governments’ affirmation that the Henoko plan is “the only resolution” (see The Asahi Shimbun).

The U.S. media’ coverage was minimal, to say the least. As Tim Shorrcok tweeted, he was the only U.S. reporter at Governor Onaga's press conference at the National Press Club in D.C. 

So far, we at OEJP have found only two articles on Governor's visit by non-Japanese media on the internet. One is by Tim Shorrock on the LobeLog Foreign Policy (read the article) and the other is by the Russia Today (read the article).

Our Analysis
It is probably too early to tell what Governor Onaga’s third visit to Washington D.C. has accomplished and what effects it will have in the future. 

However, reviewing our discussion with prefectural government officials and others as well as documents and media reports, we can argue that there was lack of strategic preparation and engagement on the part of Governor Onaga and the prefectural government. 

As Governor Onaga was preparing for his trip, the Okinawa prefectural government’s inquiries with the Okinawa Defense Bureau on the details of drilling surveys and land reclamation plans were still in process. Without sufficient information, it appears, Governor Onaga could not move on to use his next “administrative means” to stop the construction before his departure for Washington D.C. 
    
Meanwhile, as evident by the fact that there was only one U.S. reporter present at his press conference in D.C., the prefectural government failed big in terms of public relations. Dishearteningly and disturbingly, there were no releasing of statements or documents explaining Governor Onaga’s position and Okinawa’s situation from the Okinawa prefectural government before, during and after his visit.  

Moreover, the home page of the Washington D.C. Office of the Okinawa Prefectural Government, which was set up to “play a key role in the Governor’s visits to the U.S. and disseminating information on Okinawa’s situations and other matters” (see the site
), DID NOT cover its Governor's visit to D.C. (We do not know why but let you know when we find out why). 



Okinawa’s Fight Continues

It is no doubt that Governor Onaga and the Okinawa prefectural government have been overwhelmed by the Henoko issue (and other U.S. military related issues). It is also apparent that Governor Onaga and his prefectural government's capacity to challenge the Henoko plan has been undermined by both external and internal factors.


However, Okinawa's fight against the Henoko plan continues. 

As soon as the Okinawa Defense Bureau resumed drilling surveys, protesters were out in kayaks and boats in Oura Bay as well as were at the front gate of Camp Schwab in Henoko (The Asahi Shimbun).  Back in his office in Okinawa, Governor Onaga and his team are now examining his "administrative means" and assessing when to take the next step to halt the construction. 

Protesters on kayaks and Japan Coast Guard
photo by T. Kitaueda
In our view, there are two important elements that have kept and will keep Okinawa’s fight going.

One is the determination of the people of Okinawa and their supporters to fight. Their determination comes from their experience of suffering from living with so man military bases on their small islands for 70 years (see for example The Mainichi Shimbun and The Japan Times). Enough is enough.

The other element is the invaluable natural environment of Henoko and Oura Bay. As an integral part of northern Okinawa Island (a part of this area has been officially nominated for World Natural Heritage Status), the natural environment of Henoko and Oura Bay provides the people of Okinawa with both a reason and a tool to continue their fight (see IUCN Recommendationthe joint statement by 19 academic and scientific societies, and this joint statement by NGOs).   

Blue Coral in Oura Bay
photo by Osamu Makishi

OEJP joins Okinawa's fight against the construction of a new U.S. military base in Henoko and Oura Bay on the environmental front.